The Humboldtian Model and the Decline of European Educational Leadership Antonio Pérez Gómez(Spanish educational theory expert)|電経新聞

The Humboldtian Model and the Decline of European Educational Leadership Antonio Pérez Gómez(Spanish educational theory expert)

The modern research university, as understood today, originates from the Humboldtian model established in Berlin in 1810. Wilhelm von Humboldt proposed a framework that fundamentally changed the purpose and structure of higher education. By integrating research and teaching, emphasizing academic freedom, and engaging students as active participants in the production of knowledge, the model became a blueprint for the development of world-class universities.

Throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries, Europe maintained a leading role in global higher education. Many of its universities—Oxford, Cambridge, the Sorbonne, and Heidelberg, among others—were considered centres of scientific, humanistic, and philosophical innovation. However, the balance of global academic power began to shift in the 20th century, particularly due to two critical developments: the impact of World War I and II, and the rise of the American university system.

The devastation caused by the world wars was not only physical but also intellectual. European universities, particularly in Central and Eastern Europe, were deeply affected by authoritarian regimes and ideological polarization. In contrast, the United States became a destination for many leading scientists and scholars fleeing persecution. Intellectual figures such as Leo Szilard, John von Neumann, Enrico Fermi, and Albert Einstein contributed significantly to American institutions like MIT, Princeton, Caltech, and Harvard, catalysing a transformation in scientific research and education.

Post-1945, the U.S. government launched strategic initiatives that firmly established its universities at the global forefront. The National Science Foundation (1950) provided long-term funding for scientific research, while the GI Bill dramatically increased access to higher education, generating a highly educated workforce. Universities began to collaborate more closely with government and industry, creating innovation ecosystems that produced advances in engineering, computer science, physics, and later, biotechnology and artificial intelligence.

By the 1970s and 1980s, institutions such as Stanford, Berkeley, MIT, and Yale had become not only academic leaders but also hubs of technological innovation. Their proximity to industries and capacity for research commercialization positioned them at the heart of the U.S. economy. This success has proven difficult to replicate in Europe, where many universities remain hampered by limited autonomy, rigid bureaucracies, and lower per-student investment compared to the U.S. system.

Meanwhile, the 21st century has witnessed the rapid rise of Asian universities, particularly in China, Singapore, South Korea, and Japan. These countries have adopted long-term strategies combining generous state funding, institutional reform, and strong emphasis on STEM disciplines. China’s Double First-Class initiative aims to elevate a number of its universities into the world’s top tier, while Singapore’s National University of Singapore (NUS) has climbed global rankings through international collaboration and high-impact research output.

Japan, historically a leader in science and engineering education, now faces a competitive landscape. While top institutions such as The University of Tokyo, Kyoto University, and Tokyo Institute of Technology remain globally respected, Japan’s demographic challenges, limited internationalization, and modest levels of private-sector engagement in academia pose structural challenges. To maintain and enhance its standing, Japan should reinforce its research infrastructure, foster more agile university governance, and deepen partnerships between universities and technology industries.

In conclusion, the decline of European dominance in higher education has given way to a new global distribution of academic excellence. The United States consolidated its position through strategic investments and research-oriented governance, while Asia is emerging as the next centre of innovation through deliberate educational and economic policy. In this global context, Japan’s role will depend on its ability to balance tradition with transformation, ensuring that its universities not only preserve academic rigor but also lead in solving 21st-century challenges in energy, sustainability, and digital transformation.